Re: Christmas challenge...
It seems the picture was wrong, the string preload at time 1 is 150*1.7=255 N... Otherwise correct...If you enter 150 N the bow will flip over and find the other equilibrium position.The factor of 1.7...
View ArticleRe: Christmas challenge...
That's very pretty, but he seems to have missed the actual function of a compound bow - the string doesn't appear to pass over the pulleys, and the draw force curve looks nothing like that of a...
View ArticleRe: Christmas challenge...
Yes, my understaning of the compound bow is that your string turns cams located at the tips of the limbs, and those cams in turn, tighten additional strings, so as to get a "lever" for your draw force....
View ArticleRe: How to define lifting mechanism in creo.
HelloIfyouputafixinganchorageofyourAssemblyconstraintafteryouseteachmaterialwhichconsistswithitsdensity,youputasgravity(Y-9806 m/s ^ 2)onthecentreofgravityofyourAssembly.Kind regards.Denis
View ArticleRe: Christmas challenge...
I think you will have to use the Optimization/Feasibility menu:You will have to settle on more geometric items for the Design Variables such as thickness, height, etc.Add them to the Design Variables...
View ArticleRe: Christmas challenge...
Auto converge is not required with the p-element in Creo Simulate.
View ArticleRe: Simulate Results Definition (.rwd) Files
Could we have the ability to animate contact results back as well? This was also summarily removed. By animate, I mean scaled linearly by number of frames between 0 and 1 and not just time steps 0-1. I...
View ArticleRe: Simulate Results Definition (.rwd) Files
You could select more output steps, but I agree: in general it would help if you could have an animation with more steps than the output data has (some form of interpolation)
View ArticleRe: Simulate Results Definition (.rwd) Files
more steps = more contact solutions. Interpolation is quick
View ArticleRe: Christmas challenge...
Mike, Creo Simulate is based on the p-version of the finite element method, in which the fidelity of the finite element model is increased by raising the polynomial orders of the finite element basis...
View ArticleContact analysis questions
Hello All, Merry Christmas! I'm trying to simulate the insertion of a metal "y"seal (yellow) into a gland (blue) to seal around a rod (metallic color). I'm a seasoned FEA user, but this is just past...
View ArticleRe: Contact analysis questions
So linear-elastic stuff, Simulate is a decent FEA package to use. For non-linear stuff, it starts to get a little iffy, but it's still possible. Stuff like insertion forces shouldn't be an issue, but...
View ArticleRe: Contact analysis questions
Small wedge requires cylindrical coordinate system for the constraints, which gets you into trouble with the reaction load measure.You are right about the constraint on the top, that is wrong,...
View ArticleRe: Contact analysis questions
Hi Ron I thought this was going to be an easy one. Looks not too bad, but I keep on having interference. The y-seal doesn't deform enough and I don't understand why. I tried several things: refining,...
View ArticleRe: Fatigue advisor on non linear structural analyses
Charles, Here is a YouTube video on Fatigue Advisor: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kcfmxsO0vcU
View ArticleRe: Contact analysis questions
In that last image, is the displacement scale set to 1? What does your mesh look like? Keep in mind that Simulate is uses a penalty method for contact, so there will always be some level of penetration.
View ArticleRe: Contact analysis questions
the scale is indeed 1. I've tried several levels of mesh refinement, but do not see any influence on the displacement results. I find the penetration large compared to relevant geometry dimensions
View ArticleRe: Contact analysis questions
Erik, I was able to get similar results. I did see the y-seal push away from the rod and gland, as you would expect, but like you mentioned the amount of penetration still seemed large compared to the...
View ArticleRe: Contact analysis questions
ou could try with the heck, but it should mnot be necessary
View ArticleRe: Contact analysis questions
True, but you could use a link, simple spring, and a measure to get the reaction force if you really wanted it. It'd be much more efficient compared to a larger model.
View Article