Re: Non-symmetric results for symmetric model and load?
workaround: fake of geometry to bezier.example attached RegardsPaul
View ArticleHow to apply acoustic loads to structural components? Is this possible?
I have an acoustic specification in SPL vs. Hz that I need to apply to a flat panel with its supporting frame behind it. Does simulate have the capability to complete such an analysis? I imagine it...
View ArticleRe: incorrect von mises and max principal of simple lifting lug static analysis
Hi Steven, I see, the way to achieve "real" convergence in PTC CREO simulate is quite hard. I haven't really learnt how to see if i get convergence or not, compared to H-elements.I got some files from...
View ArticleCreo Simulate Force & Moment graphs?
Hi, I'm trying to create some Force & Moment diagrams for a simply supported beam, with a pin support on the left side and a roller support on the right side, and some distributed and point loads....
View ArticleRe: incorrect von mises and max principal of simple lifting lug static analysis
Anyone with experiance in validation of lifting lugs / padeyes ? Maybe you can tell me how to model this correctly Cheers
View ArticleRe: incorrect von mises and max principal of simple lifting lug static analysis
better v7 (correction of constraint)
View ArticleRe: incorrect von mises and max principal of simple lifting lug static analysis
part eye, coordinate system "rotation"
View ArticleRe: incorrect von mises and max principal of simple lifting lug static analysis
I dont understand the angles you've defined in the coordinate system rotation ...
View ArticleRe: incorrect von mises and max principal of simple lifting lug static analysis
Okay, i see. Do you think i need to make a surface in the hole or should i use that cylinder you created? Then use the ROTATION coordinate system to input the force components i calculate from the phi...
View ArticleRe: incorrect von mises and max principal of simple lifting lug static analysis
the lifting tool in the hole is better RegardsPaul
View ArticleRe: incorrect von mises and max principal of simple lifting lug static analysis
Okay I was thinking more about that coordinate system you introduced, ROTATION. In the 2nd picture i attached, with the definition of force and angles. I could probably use the ROTATION coordinate...
View ArticleRe: incorrect von mises and max principal of simple lifting lug static analysis
Assuming i have a case where the sling angle is 45 degree (phi). And due to the position of the lifting lug on the structure, my alpha angle is 70 degree. I have a vertical load (z-axis in picture) and...
View ArticleRe: incorrect von mises and max principal of simple lifting lug static analysis
traction is only one direction:x-coordinate of "ROTATION".
View ArticleRe: incorrect von mises and max principal of simple lifting lug static analysis
i saw this but i did some changes to the model, though not valid computation yet. Trying to fix the constraints... I also changed to fasteners instead of the modelled bolts.See attached file
View ArticleRe: incorrect von mises and max principal of simple lifting lug static analysis
I guess its the pin in the hole that messes up the model now but i cant find how to make the "correct" constrains.
View ArticleRe: incorrect von mises and max principal of simple lifting lug static analysis
Fastener feature is inaccurate (V9 is better). only one direction for free constraintand the same direction for load
View ArticleRe: incorrect von mises and max principal of simple lifting lug static analysis
V9, for me atleast, when i run the simulation i get warning about local reaction force that cant be calculated and also that there are singularities in the model. Running a simple SPA that it. I...
View ArticleRe: incorrect von mises and max principal of simple lifting lug static analysis
Thank you Paul, i'm going to take a look at that ! Is it me or have you changed the size of the lifting tool? Looks smaller in the picture. But not in the v10 file
View Article