Clik here to view.
Re: incorrect von mises and max principal of simple lifting lug static analysis
I see, when i open v10 i find it to be R19. I should probably delete all files and reset session. If something is stuck in the memory
View ArticleRe: incorrect von mises and max principal of simple lifting lug static analysis
Okay so we have same SPA then, only colors and the loadset that differ. How come mine is summed and yours is Loadset1: EYE ?
View ArticleRe: incorrect von mises and max principal of simple lifting lug static analysis
your colour plot is botch SIGMA 1 bigger +0 MPa can you show a correct plot?
View ArticleClik here to view.
Re: incorrect von mises and max principal of simple lifting lug static analysis
Here's a more colorful plot, SIGMA_1 +0 MPa. Also legend max is 200 MPa.
View ArticleRe: incorrect von mises and max principal of simple lifting lug static analysis
OK, I use Creo Simulate 2.0 M080 what ist your release?
View ArticleRe: incorrect von mises and max principal of simple lifting lug static analysis
Creo simulate 2.0 M180 Regards Robin
View ArticleRe: incorrect von mises and max principal of simple lifting lug static analysis
that is the difference RegardsPaul better M080
View ArticleRe: incorrect von mises and max principal of simple lifting lug static analysis
The stress difference we get, is that from the solver in M180 and M080 ? The hotspots seem to be the same but the min and max is not.
View ArticleRe: incorrect von mises and max principal of simple lifting lug static analysis
yes, but maxima are singular M080 is better, always
View ArticleRe: incorrect von mises and max principal of simple lifting lug static analysis
I'll see what my IT department can do. Or to you think they should install Creo 3.0 on my computer instead? Cheers
View ArticleClik here to view.
Re: incorrect von mises and max principal of simple lifting lug static analysis
No, Creo Simulate 2.0 M080 only
View ArticleClik here to view.
Material Assign
Hello, If you assign a Material A to a component:And then you assign a Material B to a volume region. What happens?I mean, does the Material A overrides the Material B? Or Creo understand that I want...
View ArticleFatal error near end of run on large modal analysis...
OK I have a specific error that no one here at work has seen before. I have a large model running a modal analysis on, single pass adaptive, and after the second run sometime during or after the...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Re: Non-symmetric results for symmetric model and load?
comparison bezier vs. revolve(Creo Simulate 2.0 M080)
View ArticleClik here to view.
Re: Non-symmetric results for symmetric model and load?
Prefer Swept type mesh for rotational and cylindrical objects. Formation of element and nodes plays crucial role in analysis.
View ArticleClik here to view.
Re: How to create multiple surface constraints for a simulation
I was able to find the issue,The constraints that are required to stop the ball from passing through the box are actually called "3D Contact Constraints" which can be seen in exercise 9 of the How to...
View ArticleRe: Non-symmetric results for symmetric model and load?
"Formation of element and nodes plays crucial role in analysis"yes, exactly "Prefer Swept type mesh for rotational and cylindrical objects"well, that is the problem revolve of spline geometry only is...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Straight beam limitations
Hi All, This is not new but after staring long and hard at numbers that simply 'do not add up' when comparing beam and solid model results, I realise I have been here before. So I thought I would...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Re: Non-symmetric results for symmetric model and load?
example: can you repair it? RegardsPaul
View Article