Quantcast
Channel: PTC Community: Message List - Analysis and Simulation
Viewing all 4134 articles
Browse latest View live

Re: Creo Simulate vs ANSYS Workbench contact analysis w. friction.

$
0
0

Andrea,

 

I too don't know how PTC has implemeted its contact algorithm, so I can't answer your question. Contact is indeed complex and difficult to model. From what I hear, if you need a good contact model with accurate representation of what is happening on a detailed level, MSC Marc is state of the art. I have seen some research publications where this software has been used with success.

 

I rarely use contact analysis on any more advanced level than what you see in my example here above.  If you need to understand what happens on a more detailed level than this, I would recommend physical testing. And even if you use FEA, you will need testing; if you use FEA at the limit of what it is capable of, you need to tune your model, compare with reality, so you understand what is going on, and how to interpret your FE-results relative to your test results.


Re: Folding or bending of steel full bar

$
0
0

Hellomasts,

Thankyouforyourresponseandyourexplanations.

IputthedemonstrationinGIF,becausethelinkis nolongervalid.

Kind regards.

Denis

Re: Optimization Running time

$
0
0

Hi David,

 

What did you find that was wrong with your installation?

I feel that I may have a similar issues.

 

Thanks,

Don Anderson

Fatal error while trying to run creo simulate

$
0
0

While trying to run a static analysis, an error prompt pooped up soon after I hit start. I have run multiple static analysis runs on models for the past 3 months, I am not sure why this has just recently started occurring.

Please help

thank you

Springs distributing the load along lines (or surfaces)

$
0
0

I need to apply a load on a line (force per unit length) which should locally depend on the displacement of the line in a given direction; as for an elastic foundation.

Is there any way to realize this kind of mixed boundary condition along lines?

Surface Regions Improvements - Creo Simulate Option to Split into Segments

Re: Fatal error while trying to run creo simulate

$
0
0

What version and date code of Creo Simulate are you running?

Re: Springs distributing the load along lines (or surfaces)

$
0
0

Can you upload a sketch of the physical system?


Re: Creo Simulate 4.0 (What's new)?

$
0
0

This link only has top enhancements.  If you want to see all of them for Similate 4, install the Help Center for Creo 4 and look under "What's new in Creo 4".

Two pin connections in series w

$
0
0

Hello!

 

I am trying to assemble a mechanical device that contains one body (an axle, body A) that is free to rotate in relation to ground and then on this body there is a new body (a ring, body B) that is free to rotate in relation to the first body but with its axis coincident with the first axis.

 

My idea to model this was to constrain body A with a pin connection to ground and then constrain the body B to the first with a new pin connection. I am allowed to do this but it doesn't behave as expected because when I try to drag the body B around its axis on A it to starts to rotate around its own axis to ground so that both rotates in relation to ground. I understand that this behavior doesn't contradict the connections but it is still odd behavior and when performing a dynamic simulation later I don't want the extra mass of B to effect the inertia of A.

 

Do anyone know why it behaves like this and if there is anyway around it?

 

Kind Regards

Re: Fix problem introduced in Creo 3 Creo Simulate fasteners and materials fail instead of being suppressed while in a simplified rep causing meshing failures and analysis running failures or to terminate and fail.

$
0
0

Reference PTC Technical Support Case C13398407

I had PTC look into this issue and due to me not being able to get back to the original I was not able to recreate the issue again.

My understanding at this point is the following.

Simulate features that fail due to components being excluded by a simplified rep will not be included when you create the mesh and will not be processed when you run the analysis.

 

If you run into an issue where a previous assembly crashes Creo 3 but not Creo 2 when meshing and if you delete all of the failed simulate features that fail in Creo 3 and Simulate able to successfully mesh after doing this. Please open a case with PTC and reference the case number above.

I will keep an eye open for any other assemblies that have this issue.

 

Thanks,

Don

Constraining Sliding Block

$
0
0


Hi all,

 

I'm wanting to run an FEA on the attached assembly. It consists of a wedge block which a load is applied, it slides in a track until it comes in contact with a block in which the load is transferred through. My question is how do I constrain the wedge assembly to mimic a sliding contact?

 

Thanks!

Re: Constraining Sliding Block

$
0
0

Depends on what question(s) you're interested in answering and how complex (and time consuming) of an analysis you want to do. Can you provide more detail? I ask because this could be something as simple as a hand calculation, or complex to require a FE model that'll take hours to run.

Re: Two pin connections in series w

$
0
0

I'm a little unclear of what your system looks like; can you provide some visuals? What's the goal of your simulation; what do you hope to learn? When you say, "dynamic simulation", do you mean rigid or deformable?

Re: Constraining Sliding Block

$
0
0

Thanks Shaun, I'm looking for a fairly detailed analysis. I'll try to explain a bit more detail...  ultimately I would like to know the stress in the top plate (#1). A load is applied to the face of the wedge, which can slide freely in the bottom plate until coming in contact with the block (#2). Was wondering what the best constrains would be to apply in this scenario.   Ive started running this in two steps. I first applied the load to the wedge, constrained the area that will be in contact (circled in blue). once I got this force, I started a new analysis hiding the wedge assembly, and applying the transferred load to block #2. this seems to be close to what id expect to see but I see when running the animation I see large interferences between block #1 and #2. I'm playing a bit with contacts and interfaces to see if this will eliminate this.

 

Again, any help is greatly appreciated.wedge_loading.JPG


Re: Two pin connections in series w

$
0
0

I'm assuming you want to do this analysis in Creo Mechanism / Mechanism dynamics, i.e. rigid body motion, correct? If you assemble components using mechanism constraints, just make sure you connect the right thing with the right thing. I.e. when connecting part A with part B, make sure you only use references from A and B. When you "click and drag" components, they might always not move as you intuitively would expect. If you impose the motion using motors/forces on joint axes / parts, you get a better idea if your components are properly connected.

 

If you are anlayzing this in Creo  Simulate (i.e. FE-analysis), I prefer to use beam elements and links to create "joints" where I can control what degrees of freedom to release or not. Just as with Mechanism Design/Mechanism dynamics, you need to be careful what you connect to what.

Creo Parametric Material Files (Library)

$
0
0

Hi,

 

Is there a good, current source for downloading Creo Material files? I am looking for commonly used metals and plastics. It seems crazy that every individual or organization has to create their own material library. I'm assuming this has been done many times, but cannot find a definitive source online.

 

-Scott

Re: Creo Parametric Material Files (Library)

$
0
0

Hello  Scott Morris

 

yes, it seems crazy, but my praxis is the same. l´m supplementing my personal material library (very primitive way).

We don´t use FEM analysis, so the only different betwwen steel materials are: density, file name and description.

In this case it´s not so complicated to create larger library.

Don´t know where to donwload materials library.

 

Hope someone will upload some surprise link

Regards

Milan Bonka

Re: Creo Parametric Material Files (Library)

$
0
0

Creo 4.0 comes with the materials below. The reason that more materials aren't provided is because material properties are unique to the application. They can change with temperature, orientation, batch lot and risk. By risk I mean S, B or A basis. Aside from that companies don't want to get sued if you use those properties incorrectly and then your design fails (there are cases where this has happened).

 

Aside from the default materials that come with Creo 4.0 below there are companies that provide this information:

 

GRANTA MI:Materials Gateway for Creo

Matereality

Online Materials Information Resource - MatWeb

 

Here are some other threads which contain materials:

Creo Materials Library

Materials.rar

 

PTC response:

Material database

 

metal_aluminium_5052.mtl

metal_aluminium_6061.mtl

metal_aluminum_aa2014.mtl

metal_aluminum_aa2024.mtl

metal_brass.mtl

metal_bronze.mtl

metal_copper.mtl

metal_low_melting_point_alloy.mtl

metal_steel_high_carbon.mtl

metal_steel_low_carbon.mtl

misc_cardboard.mtl

misc_medium_density_fiberboard.mtl

misc_water.mtl

plastic_abs.mtl

plastic_acrylic.mtl

plastic_hdpe.mtl

plastic_hips.mtl

plastic_ldpe.mtl

plastic_nylon_6.mtl

plastic_pet.mtl

plastic_polypropylene.mtl

plastic_polystyrene_foam_depron.mtl

plastic_polyurethane_molded.mtl

plastic_polyurethane_ureol.mtl

plastic_ptfe.mtl

plastic_pvc.mtl

rubber_silicon.mtl

wood_american_beech.mtl

wood_american_mahogany.mtl

wood_american_pine_wood.mtl

wood_american_white_oak.mtl

wood_balsa.mtl

Re: Creo Parametric Material Files (Library)

Viewing all 4134 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>